<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assistant Collector for the appellants to demonstrate the quantity of steam used in the distillery unit. The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the importance of satisfying the department&#039;s requirements for availing statutory benefits and the limitations on demanding duty for extended periods without evidence of fraud.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:19:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assistant Collector for the appellants to demonstrate the quantity of steam used in the distillery unit. The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the importance of satisfying the department&#039;s requirements for availing statutory benefits and the limitations on demanding duty for extended periods without evidence of fraud.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>