https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74059 In preventive detention, omission of a document vitiates the order only if it is vital or material to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. The varying bail-condition order was held immaterial because it did not decisively affect the detention grounds, so non-placement did not invalidate the order. The detenu's retraction application was also not fatal, as the authority was already aware of the retraction aspect through other material. Non-supply of bank pass books and seized loose sheets did not impair the right to effective representation because they were not shown to be relied-upon or material documents. The detention order was upheld and the appeal failed. en-us Fri, 09 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74059 In preventive detention, omission of a document vitiates the order only if it is vital or material to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. The varying bail-condition order was held immaterial because it did not decisively affect the detention grounds, so non-placement did not invalidate the order. The detenu's retraction application was also not fatal, as the authority was already aware of the retraction aspect through other material. Non-supply of bank pass books and seized loose sheets did not impair the right to effective representation because they were not shown to be relied-upon or material documents. The detention order was upheld and the appeal failed. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 09 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74059