<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74052</link>
    <description>Furnace oil used only to generate steam during trial runs and commissioning of a urea plant, where no urea was produced, did not qualify as use as &quot;feed stock&quot; for exemption under the notification. The exemption was limited to furnace oil used as feed stock in the manufacture of fertilizer, and mere steam generation was held not to satisfy that description. The benefit of exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74052</link>
      <description>Furnace oil used only to generate steam during trial runs and commissioning of a urea plant, where no urea was produced, did not qualify as use as &quot;feed stock&quot; for exemption under the notification. The exemption was limited to furnace oil used as feed stock in the manufacture of fertilizer, and mere steam generation was held not to satisfy that description. The benefit of exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>