<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 142 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74031</link>
    <description>Related-person status under excise valuation was examined by reference to mutuality of interest, family connection and commercial linkage, but the record was considered insufficient to conclusively determine the true nature of the dealings. The valuation of trailers was held not to follow automatically from any related-person finding; the assessable value had to be fixed on the actual sales channel, with normal wholesale price applied where ascertainable and valuation-rule adjustments considered where sales were through agents or retail outlets. The orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on a proper factual foundation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:18:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 142 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74031</link>
      <description>Related-person status under excise valuation was examined by reference to mutuality of interest, family connection and commercial linkage, but the record was considered insufficient to conclusively determine the true nature of the dealings. The valuation of trailers was held not to follow automatically from any related-person finding; the assessable value had to be fixed on the actual sales channel, with normal wholesale price applied where ascertainable and valuation-rule adjustments considered where sales were through agents or retail outlets. The orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on a proper factual foundation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>