<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 291 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74012</link>
    <description>Unconditional stay of recovery was granted against duty and penalty arising from disallowance of MODVAT credit, as the Tribunal found a strong prima facie case on the basis of the Government of India&#039;s directive treating iron and steel scrap as deemed duty-paid and permitting credit without production of GP1. Earlier appellate rulings, including the decision in Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. Kapson Electro Stampings, also supported the applicant&#039;s claim. The disallowance of MODVAT credit taken in July 1986 was stayed for the purposes of Section 35F of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944, and the Revenue was given liberty to seek early hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:05:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 291 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74012</link>
      <description>Unconditional stay of recovery was granted against duty and penalty arising from disallowance of MODVAT credit, as the Tribunal found a strong prima facie case on the basis of the Government of India&#039;s directive treating iron and steel scrap as deemed duty-paid and permitting credit without production of GP1. Earlier appellate rulings, including the decision in Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. Kapson Electro Stampings, also supported the applicant&#039;s claim. The disallowance of MODVAT credit taken in July 1986 was stayed for the purposes of Section 35F of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944, and the Revenue was given liberty to seek early hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>