https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74005 In preventive detention matters, only documents truly vital to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be disclosed; omission of a bail application was not fatal where the early retraction was not shown to be within the sponsoring agency's knowledge and a later retraction was considered. Delay in deciding the detenu's representation did not invalidate detention where it was explained by file movement and ministerial processing. A short interval between investigation material and the detention order did not by itself show non-application of mind, especially in the context of repeated hawala activity. The authority was not required to verify actual availing of bail, and later relaxation of bail conditions was not a material circumstance requiring disclosure. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74005 In preventive detention matters, only documents truly vital to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be disclosed; omission of a bail application was not fatal where the early retraction was not shown to be within the sponsoring agency's knowledge and a later retraction was considered. Delay in deciding the detenu's representation did not invalidate detention where it was explained by file movement and ministerial processing. A short interval between investigation material and the detention order did not by itself show non-application of mind, especially in the context of repeated hawala activity. The authority was not required to verify actual availing of bail, and later relaxation of bail conditions was not a material circumstance requiring disclosure. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74005