https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74000 An adjudication order was held vulnerable where the first personal hearing was not effectively afforded after an adjournment request had been made before the scheduled date. The record showed that the order was passed on the footing that no appearance was made, but the absence of a meaningful opportunity to be heard amounted to procedural unfairness. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after granting a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:35:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74000 An adjudication order was held vulnerable where the first personal hearing was not effectively afforded after an adjournment request had been made before the scheduled date. The record showed that the order was passed on the footing that no appearance was made, but the absence of a meaningful opportunity to be heard amounted to procedural unfairness. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after granting a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74000