<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the process of galvanization of steel structural materials did not constitute manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff. As the Tribunal agreed with the Appellate Collector&#039;s decision, it did not address the timeliness issue of the revision show cause notice. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal in favor of the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the process of galvanization of steel structural materials did not constitute manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff. As the Tribunal agreed with the Appellate Collector&#039;s decision, it did not address the timeliness issue of the revision show cause notice. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal in favor of the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>