https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73966 The Madras High Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Sections 135(1)(b)(i) and 135(1)(b)(ii) of the Customs Act for possessing foreign electronic items without proper documentation. The court determined that the offence did not involve moral turpitude, as it did not bring shame to the individual convicted. Consequently, the conviction did not lead to automatic termination of employment at Canara Bank, as the specific offences under the Customs Act were not deemed to be of moral turpitude. The revision petition was dismissed, affirming that the conviction did not impact the accused's employment. en-us Fri, 15 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:29:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73966 The Madras High Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Sections 135(1)(b)(i) and 135(1)(b)(ii) of the Customs Act for possessing foreign electronic items without proper documentation. The court determined that the offence did not involve moral turpitude, as it did not bring shame to the individual convicted. Consequently, the conviction did not lead to automatic termination of employment at Canara Bank, as the specific offences under the Customs Act were not deemed to be of moral turpitude. The revision petition was dismissed, affirming that the conviction did not impact the accused's employment. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73966