<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 263 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73960</link>
    <description>Alleged wholesale sales to independent dealers were rejected as non-genuine where surrounding circumstances, dealer statements, commission arrangements, route restrictions, and use of the former distributor&#039;s facilities showed a controlled marketing structure rather than true arm&#039;s length sales at the factory gate. On that basis, the revised price list was not accepted for valuation and the duty demand based on suppression and misdeclaration was sustained. The commentary also notes that while penalty was justified for evasion, it had to remain proportionate, so the penalty was reduced and the confiscation of land, building, plant and machinery was set aside for lack of adequate justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:16:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 263 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73960</link>
      <description>Alleged wholesale sales to independent dealers were rejected as non-genuine where surrounding circumstances, dealer statements, commission arrangements, route restrictions, and use of the former distributor&#039;s facilities showed a controlled marketing structure rather than true arm&#039;s length sales at the factory gate. On that basis, the revised price list was not accepted for valuation and the duty demand based on suppression and misdeclaration was sustained. The commentary also notes that while penalty was justified for evasion, it had to remain proportionate, so the penalty was reduced and the confiscation of land, building, plant and machinery was set aside for lack of adequate justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>