https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73946 Where adjudication proceedings were already pending before the Collector, continuation of a gold dealer's licence suspension by a subordinate authority was treated as inappropriate, especially when the show cause notice was issued after the suspension order. The analysis noted that no final view was expressed on the Assistant Collector's abstract competence under Section 50(1) of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, but any cancellation action under Section 50(1A) would require a fresh notice and opportunity of hearing. The adjudicating authority was therefore the proper forum to decide whether suspension should continue, and the impugned order was set aside, leaving the Collector to examine the matter according to law. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73946 Where adjudication proceedings were already pending before the Collector, continuation of a gold dealer's licence suspension by a subordinate authority was treated as inappropriate, especially when the show cause notice was issued after the suspension order. The analysis noted that no final view was expressed on the Assistant Collector's abstract competence under Section 50(1) of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, but any cancellation action under Section 50(1A) would require a fresh notice and opportunity of hearing. The adjudicating authority was therefore the proper forum to decide whether suspension should continue, and the impugned order was set aside, leaving the Collector to examine the matter according to law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73946