<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73945</link>
    <description>Under Rule 56-A(5)(i) of the Central Excise Rules, the six-month notice period runs from the date credit is taken and entered in the RG 23 register, not from the later date of utilisation for clearance of finished goods. Limitation therefore had to be computed from the original date of credit, because counting from utilisation would depart from the statutory wording. The order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication on the correct limitation basis, which was stated to be in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73945</link>
      <description>Under Rule 56-A(5)(i) of the Central Excise Rules, the six-month notice period runs from the date credit is taken and entered in the RG 23 register, not from the later date of utilisation for clearance of finished goods. Limitation therefore had to be computed from the original date of credit, because counting from utilisation would depart from the statutory wording. The order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication on the correct limitation basis, which was stated to be in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>