https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73928 Failure to place a nil search panchanama before the detaining authority vitiates a preventive detention order where the document is vital to subjective satisfaction. The panchanama showing that nothing incriminating was recovered from the detenu's residence was material because it could have influenced the decision on whether detention was necessary. As the sponsoring authority did not submit that document, the material before the detaining authority was incomplete, and the detention was therefore invalidated. en-us Fri, 26 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73928 Failure to place a nil search panchanama before the detaining authority vitiates a preventive detention order where the document is vital to subjective satisfaction. The panchanama showing that nothing incriminating was recovered from the detenu's residence was material because it could have influenced the decision on whether detention was necessary. As the sponsoring authority did not submit that document, the material before the detaining authority was incomplete, and the detention was therefore invalidated. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73928