https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73923 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that they are entitled to cash assistance under the Export Assistant Scheme for Cotton Textiles for contracts entered into before the Scheme's withdrawal on 1st January 1979. The judgment invoked the doctrine of promissory estoppel, emphasizing the petitioners' reliance on the Scheme's assurance and the losses incurred upon export. The court rejected the first respondent's justification for withdrawing the Scheme and ordered a review of each contract for eligibility within six months. The petitioners were awarded costs and affirmed their entitlement to cash assistance under the Scheme for pre-withdrawal contracts. en-us Fri, 13 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:11:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73923 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that they are entitled to cash assistance under the Export Assistant Scheme for Cotton Textiles for contracts entered into before the Scheme's withdrawal on 1st January 1979. The judgment invoked the doctrine of promissory estoppel, emphasizing the petitioners' reliance on the Scheme's assurance and the losses incurred upon export. The court rejected the first respondent's justification for withdrawing the Scheme and ordered a review of each contract for eligibility within six months. The petitioners were awarded costs and affirmed their entitlement to cash assistance under the Scheme for pre-withdrawal contracts. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73923