<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 105 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73919</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise challenging an order-in-appeal was dismissed due to a delay of 29 days in filing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s request for condonation of delay was rejected by the Tribunal, citing insufficient cause for the delay and emphasizing the need for a rational application of the doctrine regarding delay condonation. The Tribunal held that administrative reasons alone were not sufficient justification for the delay and dismissed the appeal on the grounds of being time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:36:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 105 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73919</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise challenging an order-in-appeal was dismissed due to a delay of 29 days in filing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s request for condonation of delay was rejected by the Tribunal, citing insufficient cause for the delay and emphasizing the need for a rational application of the doctrine regarding delay condonation. The Tribunal held that administrative reasons alone were not sufficient justification for the delay and dismissed the appeal on the grounds of being time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>