<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73901</link>
    <description>A fiscal notification cannot be treated as retrospective in the absence of express language or necessary implication, so Notification No. 102/81 did not extend the set-off benefit under Notification No. 201/79 to periods before 11.4.1981. The Tribunal also held that proforma credit on duty-paid inputs was not admissible under Notification No. 201/79 merely because those inputs were used in relation to waste, by-products or non-excisable products; the scheme of that notification could not be expanded by importing reasoning from Rule 56-A or a different judicial context. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded and the relief granted below was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73901</link>
      <description>A fiscal notification cannot be treated as retrospective in the absence of express language or necessary implication, so Notification No. 102/81 did not extend the set-off benefit under Notification No. 201/79 to periods before 11.4.1981. The Tribunal also held that proforma credit on duty-paid inputs was not admissible under Notification No. 201/79 merely because those inputs were used in relation to waste, by-products or non-excisable products; the scheme of that notification could not be expanded by importing reasoning from Rule 56-A or a different judicial context. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded and the relief granted below was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>