<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 242 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73899</link>
    <description>Penal confiscation of currency under the Customs Act requires acceptable legal evidence, direct or circumstantial, that the money represents sale proceeds of contraband goods; a mere doubt about source is insufficient, and an inference based on surmise cannot sustain confiscation. The note also states that where a licensed gold dealer was acting under an operative interim court order permitting business through travelling salesmen, the licensing restriction could not be applied to treat the transactions as a contravention of the Gold (Control) Act. On that reasoning, both the currency confiscation and the associated fine and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 242 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73899</link>
      <description>Penal confiscation of currency under the Customs Act requires acceptable legal evidence, direct or circumstantial, that the money represents sale proceeds of contraband goods; a mere doubt about source is insufficient, and an inference based on surmise cannot sustain confiscation. The note also states that where a licensed gold dealer was acting under an operative interim court order permitting business through travelling salesmen, the licensing restriction could not be applied to treat the transactions as a contravention of the Gold (Control) Act. On that reasoning, both the currency confiscation and the associated fine and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>