<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 232 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73886</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 52/78-CE was unavailable where electricity generated in the plant was mixed with purchased electricity in a common grid and part of the supply was used outside the generating station; in that situation, the exempt quantity had not been distinctly proved and a proportionate duty basis was justified. Recovery of short-levied duty under Section 11-A could validly cover the statutory six-month period before the notice, as that provision was treated as the complete recovery mechanism. A wrong reference to Rule 9(2) did not invalidate the demand where the substantive requirements for recovery were satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:48:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 232 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73886</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 52/78-CE was unavailable where electricity generated in the plant was mixed with purchased electricity in a common grid and part of the supply was used outside the generating station; in that situation, the exempt quantity had not been distinctly proved and a proportionate duty basis was justified. Recovery of short-levied duty under Section 11-A could validly cover the statutory six-month period before the notice, as that provision was treated as the complete recovery mechanism. A wrong reference to Rule 9(2) did not invalidate the demand where the substantive requirements for recovery were satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>