<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73860</link>
    <description>An adjudication involving a substantial duty demand cannot be sustained where the appellants were not given a proper personal hearing. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after one reasonable opportunity of hearing. Because the adjudication was not maintained and the dispute was sent back for reconsideration, deposit of the adjudged duty and penalty was waived pending the fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73860</link>
      <description>An adjudication involving a substantial duty demand cannot be sustained where the appellants were not given a proper personal hearing. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after one reasonable opportunity of hearing. Because the adjudication was not maintained and the dispute was sent back for reconsideration, deposit of the adjudged duty and penalty was waived pending the fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>