<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73836</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit on HDPE, LDPE and similar inputs was denied where the inputs were not used to make packing materials in the assessee&#039;s factory but were sent to outside processors, and the finished packing materials were brought back exempt from duty. Rule 57F(2) was held inapplicable because it contemplates removal of inputs for manufacture of intermediate products that require further processing in the factory before use in the final products. As the returned packing materials were already finished goods and not intermediate products, the claim that the inputs were used in or in relation to manufacture of the final cosmetics and toilet preparations was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73836</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit on HDPE, LDPE and similar inputs was denied where the inputs were not used to make packing materials in the assessee&#039;s factory but were sent to outside processors, and the finished packing materials were brought back exempt from duty. Rule 57F(2) was held inapplicable because it contemplates removal of inputs for manufacture of intermediate products that require further processing in the factory before use in the final products. As the returned packing materials were already finished goods and not intermediate products, the claim that the inputs were used in or in relation to manufacture of the final cosmetics and toilet preparations was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>