<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73824</link>
    <description>An earlier quasi-judicial approval of classification lists may be reopened only on legally cognizable grounds such as fresh facts, a change in law, or previously unconsidered material; revocation based on an incorrect factual premise is without proper jurisdiction and cannot stand. The denial of concessional duty under Notification No. 7/80 was also unsustainable because it rested on the mistaken assumption that formaldehyde had been purchased and brought into the factory, whereas the record showed in-house manufacture from methanol. The impugned orders were therefore set aside, although the substantive eligibility for the concession was left open for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:39:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73824</link>
      <description>An earlier quasi-judicial approval of classification lists may be reopened only on legally cognizable grounds such as fresh facts, a change in law, or previously unconsidered material; revocation based on an incorrect factual premise is without proper jurisdiction and cannot stand. The denial of concessional duty under Notification No. 7/80 was also unsustainable because it rested on the mistaken assumption that formaldehyde had been purchased and brought into the factory, whereas the record showed in-house manufacture from methanol. The impugned orders were therefore set aside, although the substantive eligibility for the concession was left open for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>