<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 200 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73819</link>
    <description>Partners cannot be proceeded against under the vicarious liability provision of the Essential Commodities Act unless the firm is first charged as the principal offender and the record shows that the partners were in overall control of, and responsible for, the day-to-day business of the firm. Mere status as a partner, or a clause permitting operation of the bank account, is insufficient to establish liability. As no charge under the relevant provision was laid against the firm and no material showed the petitioners&#039; day-to-day control, the charge against the partners was quashed and they were discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 200 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73819</link>
      <description>Partners cannot be proceeded against under the vicarious liability provision of the Essential Commodities Act unless the firm is first charged as the principal offender and the record shows that the partners were in overall control of, and responsible for, the day-to-day business of the firm. Mere status as a partner, or a clause permitting operation of the bank account, is insufficient to establish liability. As no charge under the relevant provision was laid against the firm and no material showed the petitioners&#039; day-to-day control, the charge against the partners was quashed and they were discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>