<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73813</link>
    <description>Paraffinic oils suitable for use as rubber plasticizers were treated as covered by the specific import licence description, because the latest chemist&#039;s opinion and the manufacturer&#039;s literature supported that technical characterisation. Reading Appendix 5 and Appendix 9 harmoniously, the specific policy entry for paraffinic oils was held not to be displaced by the general White Oil description, so paragraph 240(a) did not defeat licence coverage. The import was therefore accepted as within the licences, and the contrary order was set aside, while tariff classification and rate of duty were left undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73813</link>
      <description>Paraffinic oils suitable for use as rubber plasticizers were treated as covered by the specific import licence description, because the latest chemist&#039;s opinion and the manufacturer&#039;s literature supported that technical characterisation. Reading Appendix 5 and Appendix 9 harmoniously, the specific policy entry for paraffinic oils was held not to be displaced by the general White Oil description, so paragraph 240(a) did not defeat licence coverage. The import was therefore accepted as within the licences, and the contrary order was set aside, while tariff classification and rate of duty were left undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>