<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported bimetal bearings as thin walled bearings under Tariff Item 34A of the Central Excise Tariff. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods did not meet ISI Specifications for thin walled bearings, the Tribunal relied on trade understanding to affirm the classification. The dispute over countervailing duty was settled in favor of the revenue, dismissing the appeals and confirming the levy of duty on the imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:41:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported bimetal bearings as thin walled bearings under Tariff Item 34A of the Central Excise Tariff. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods did not meet ISI Specifications for thin walled bearings, the Tribunal relied on trade understanding to affirm the classification. The dispute over countervailing duty was settled in favor of the revenue, dismissing the appeals and confirming the levy of duty on the imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>