<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73800</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of the Collector (Appeals) and remanded the matter to the Assistant Collector for de novo consideration and adjudication. The Tribunal directed a thorough examination of the nature of each variety of waste and the applicability of relevant notifications and case laws, ultimately allowing the appeals by remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73800</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of the Collector (Appeals) and remanded the matter to the Assistant Collector for de novo consideration and adjudication. The Tribunal directed a thorough examination of the nature of each variety of waste and the applicability of relevant notifications and case laws, ultimately allowing the appeals by remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>