<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73774</link>
    <description>Transformers assembled from duty-paid components were treated as commercially distinct finished goods and therefore separately excisable; the plea against duty on the ground of double taxation was rejected. Extended limitation was not available because the notice lacked allegations of fraud, suppression, or similar intent-based default, so the demand was confined to the normal period and penalty was set aside. Exemption under Notification No. 57/75 was not established, Notification No. 118/75 was held inapplicable, and set-off under Notification No. 201/79 was allowed to the extent supported by the evidence, with recomputation directed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73774</link>
      <description>Transformers assembled from duty-paid components were treated as commercially distinct finished goods and therefore separately excisable; the plea against duty on the ground of double taxation was rejected. Extended limitation was not available because the notice lacked allegations of fraud, suppression, or similar intent-based default, so the demand was confined to the normal period and penalty was set aside. Exemption under Notification No. 57/75 was not established, Notification No. 118/75 was held inapplicable, and set-off under Notification No. 201/79 was allowed to the extent supported by the evidence, with recomputation directed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>