<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 159 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73772</link>
    <description>A provisional approval of a price list, including refusal to accept a bank guarantee as security, was treated as a provisional administrative step rather than an adjudication on rights or liabilities. On that basis, it was held not to be an appealable order under Section 35 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and the Collector (Appeals) had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. The objection that maintainability had not been specifically pleaded was rejected because appealability is a question of law that may be examined from the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:24:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 159 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73772</link>
      <description>A provisional approval of a price list, including refusal to accept a bank guarantee as security, was treated as a provisional administrative step rather than an adjudication on rights or liabilities. On that basis, it was held not to be an appealable order under Section 35 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and the Collector (Appeals) had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. The objection that maintainability had not been specifically pleaded was rejected because appealability is a question of law that may be examined from the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>