https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73750 Illegibility of some detention papers did not invalidate preventive detention where the detenu still knew the factual basis and could make an effective representation under Article 22(5). Delay between the incident and the detention order did not vitiate the order because the Court accepted the administrative explanation and treated proximity as only a subsidiary test. Retention of the detenu's passport did not bar detention, and the authority could infer continuation of unlawful foreign exchange activity. Non-supply of Hindi translations and the joint remand application also caused no prejudice, so the detention was sustained. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73750 Illegibility of some detention papers did not invalidate preventive detention where the detenu still knew the factual basis and could make an effective representation under Article 22(5). Delay between the incident and the detention order did not vitiate the order because the Court accepted the administrative explanation and treated proximity as only a subsidiary test. Retention of the detenu's passport did not bar detention, and the authority could infer continuation of unlawful foreign exchange activity. Non-supply of Hindi translations and the joint remand application also caused no prejudice, so the detention was sustained. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73750