<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 276 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73741</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The confiscation of items from the residential premises and the penalty imposed were set aside. The matter was remanded to the Additional Collector for fresh consideration of the goods seized from the residential premises. The confiscation of goods from the shop premises was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:32:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 276 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73741</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The confiscation of items from the residential premises and the penalty imposed were set aside. The matter was remanded to the Additional Collector for fresh consideration of the goods seized from the residential premises. The confiscation of goods from the shop premises was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>