https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73719 A preventive detention order based on alleged smuggling of gold and foreign currency was challenged on the ground that the detenu's bail order was not placed before, or considered by, the detaining authority, causing non-application of mind. The record showed that both the bail application and the bail order were placed before the authority and taken into account in the detention process. The court found no withholding of vital material and no basis to infer arbitrariness or mala fides in the subjective satisfaction supporting detention. The challenge therefore failed, and the detention order was upheld. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73719 A preventive detention order based on alleged smuggling of gold and foreign currency was challenged on the ground that the detenu's bail order was not placed before, or considered by, the detaining authority, causing non-application of mind. The record showed that both the bail application and the bail order were placed before the authority and taken into account in the detention process. The court found no withholding of vital material and no basis to infer arbitrariness or mala fides in the subjective satisfaction supporting detention. The challenge therefore failed, and the detention order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73719