<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 245 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73714</link>
    <description>Import-control rules governing release orders for imported steel allowed both allotment and cancellation within one integrated administrative scheme. Paragraph 292 authorised cancellation or suspension where a release order was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, breach of conditions, contravention of the import policy, or misuse, provided a reasonable hearing was given. The Court accepted that executive power under Article 73 extended to such matters within Parliament&#039;s competence and that administrative import-control instructions could validly regulate cancellation. It therefore held that the allottee had no absolute vested right to retain the quota against lawful cancellation for misrepresentation or breach, and the challenge to action under paragraph 292 failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 245 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73714</link>
      <description>Import-control rules governing release orders for imported steel allowed both allotment and cancellation within one integrated administrative scheme. Paragraph 292 authorised cancellation or suspension where a release order was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, breach of conditions, contravention of the import policy, or misuse, provided a reasonable hearing was given. The Court accepted that executive power under Article 73 extended to such matters within Parliament&#039;s competence and that administrative import-control instructions could validly regulate cancellation. It therefore held that the allottee had no absolute vested right to retain the quota against lawful cancellation for misrepresentation or breach, and the challenge to action under paragraph 292 failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>