<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 140 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73710</link>
    <description>The tribunal found Section 129-E of the Customs Act inapplicable for releasing goods without payment due to the goods being under customs control. While rejecting the applicants&#039; request for stay on redemption fine and duty, the tribunal waived the predeposit of penalty amounts due to undue hardship. Specific deposit amounts and timelines were set for compliance, with consequences for failure to adhere. An alternative prayer for early hearing was granted post-compliance with order terms, directing the applicants to seek early hearing thereafter. The tribunal partly allowed the stay applications, outlining clear directions and conditions for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 23:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 140 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73710</link>
      <description>The tribunal found Section 129-E of the Customs Act inapplicable for releasing goods without payment due to the goods being under customs control. While rejecting the applicants&#039; request for stay on redemption fine and duty, the tribunal waived the predeposit of penalty amounts due to undue hardship. Specific deposit amounts and timelines were set for compliance, with consequences for failure to adhere. An alternative prayer for early hearing was granted post-compliance with order terms, directing the applicants to seek early hearing thereafter. The tribunal partly allowed the stay applications, outlining clear directions and conditions for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>