<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 125 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73694</link>
    <description>Radiator hoses specially cut and fabricated to the contour and specification of motor vehicles were treated as identifiable motor vehicle components rather than as generic piping or tubing of unhardened vulcanised rubber. The decisive test was whether the article was a component part of a motor vehicle, not merely the material from which it was made. Because radiator hoses were not specifically covered by the amended motor vehicle entry, they fell to be classified under the residuary tariff item. The goods were therefore classified as motor vehicle parts under the residuary entry, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:07:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 125 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73694</link>
      <description>Radiator hoses specially cut and fabricated to the contour and specification of motor vehicles were treated as identifiable motor vehicle components rather than as generic piping or tubing of unhardened vulcanised rubber. The decisive test was whether the article was a component part of a motor vehicle, not merely the material from which it was made. Because radiator hoses were not specifically covered by the amended motor vehicle entry, they fell to be classified under the residuary tariff item. The goods were therefore classified as motor vehicle parts under the residuary entry, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>