<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 119 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73688</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the court held that the authorized dealers and buyers in the second tier were separate classes of buyers. The net discount after considering additional considerations should be used for assessable value calculation. The court directed the Assistant Collector to re-determine the assessable values based on these findings, entitling the appellants to consequential benefits. The claim for deduction of post-manufacturing expenses was not considered due to the absence of a direct claim in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:53:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 119 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73688</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the court held that the authorized dealers and buyers in the second tier were separate classes of buyers. The net discount after considering additional considerations should be used for assessable value calculation. The court directed the Assistant Collector to re-determine the assessable values based on these findings, entitling the appellants to consequential benefits. The claim for deduction of post-manufacturing expenses was not considered due to the absence of a direct claim in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>