https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73680 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that they did not manufacture and sell "rapid hardening cement" as claimed by the Central Excise Officers. Despite initial concerns raised based on test certificates, the Tribunal found that the appellants' production matched the specifications of ordinary portland cement. Emphasizing the credibility of the National Test House's findings and considering various supporting documents, including invoices and agreements, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants were not in violation of the Cement Control Order. The appeal was allowed, and the ruling favored the appellants. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:32:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73680 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that they did not manufacture and sell "rapid hardening cement" as claimed by the Central Excise Officers. Despite initial concerns raised based on test certificates, the Tribunal found that the appellants' production matched the specifications of ordinary portland cement. Emphasizing the credibility of the National Test House's findings and considering various supporting documents, including invoices and agreements, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants were not in violation of the Cement Control Order. The appeal was allowed, and the ruling favored the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73680