<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73677</link>
    <description>The bench set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions due to lack of specificity in assessing dubbed feature films for duty concession under Notification No. 275/77-C.E. The Collector (Appeals) had granted blanket concessions without individual assessment, contrary to Tribunal decisions requiring distinct evaluations. The judgment emphasized the necessity of aligning cases with relevant precedents and issuing detailed orders based on specific characteristics of dubbed films to determine eligibility for duty concessions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73677</link>
      <description>The bench set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions due to lack of specificity in assessing dubbed feature films for duty concession under Notification No. 275/77-C.E. The Collector (Appeals) had granted blanket concessions without individual assessment, contrary to Tribunal decisions requiring distinct evaluations. The judgment emphasized the necessity of aligning cases with relevant precedents and issuing detailed orders based on specific characteristics of dubbed films to determine eligibility for duty concessions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>