<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 182 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73667</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a woollen textile mill, in a case where authorities sought to forfeit an amount under a bond due to alleged failure to export woollen fabrics as required. The petitioner&#039;s export through an agency was deemed compliant with the bond&#039;s obligation, supported by relevant documents and certificates confirming adherence to specified conditions. The Court found no grounds for action against the petitioner, leading to a successful petition without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 182 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73667</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a woollen textile mill, in a case where authorities sought to forfeit an amount under a bond due to alleged failure to export woollen fabrics as required. The petitioner&#039;s export through an agency was deemed compliant with the bond&#039;s obligation, supported by relevant documents and certificates confirming adherence to specified conditions. The Court found no grounds for action against the petitioner, leading to a successful petition without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>