https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73655 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the imported goods did not qualify as "AID cargo" due to the petitioners' failure to provide essential documentation as required by the public notice issued by the Ministry of Commerce in 1964. The claim for compensation by the importers was rejected based on the lack of compliance with the mandatory requirements for goods to be classified as "AID cargo." en-us Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:14:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73655 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the imported goods did not qualify as "AID cargo" due to the petitioners' failure to provide essential documentation as required by the public notice issued by the Ministry of Commerce in 1964. The claim for compensation by the importers was rejected based on the lack of compliance with the mandatory requirements for goods to be classified as "AID cargo." Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73655