https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73645 The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the Department's claim of suppression in the case involving the waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty for clandestine removal of bimetallic strips. The petitioners' argument that the strips were processed at one unit and used in manufacturing at other units, coupled with the lack of concrete proof of clandestine removal, led to the Tribunal's decision to waive a partial pre-deposit and waive the remaining duty and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal highlighted the petitioners' wide publication of their manufacturing activities as supporting evidence of innocence. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:51:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73645 The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the Department's claim of suppression in the case involving the waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty for clandestine removal of bimetallic strips. The petitioners' argument that the strips were processed at one unit and used in manufacturing at other units, coupled with the lack of concrete proof of clandestine removal, led to the Tribunal's decision to waive a partial pre-deposit and waive the remaining duty and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal highlighted the petitioners' wide publication of their manufacturing activities as supporting evidence of innocence. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73645