https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73636 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the order of summary rejection and directing the 2nd respondent to supply the allocated quantity of edible oil to the appellants. The 1st respondent was instructed to make allocation orders in favor of the appellants for subsequent months within a specified timeline. The court granted interim relief to the appellants due to delays in completing the inquiry against them, considering their business interests. No costs were awarded in the judgment. en-us Fri, 15 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73636 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the order of summary rejection and directing the 2nd respondent to supply the allocated quantity of edible oil to the appellants. The 1st respondent was instructed to make allocation orders in favor of the appellants for subsequent months within a specified timeline. The court granted interim relief to the appellants due to delays in completing the inquiry against them, considering their business interests. No costs were awarded in the judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73636