<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 205 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73632</link>
    <description>In bail matters involving serious customs smuggling, the dominant considerations remain the gravity of the offence, prima facie material, and the real risk of absconding; those factors justified setting aside the bail order where foreign nationals faced a substantial flight risk. The first proviso to Section 437(1) does not make release mandatory merely because the accused is a woman, and Section 437(6) is counted from the first date fixed for recording evidence after charge, not from pre-charge evidence in a complaint case. Compassionate grounds such as illness of a child did not outweigh custody where medical care was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 205 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73632</link>
      <description>In bail matters involving serious customs smuggling, the dominant considerations remain the gravity of the offence, prima facie material, and the real risk of absconding; those factors justified setting aside the bail order where foreign nationals faced a substantial flight risk. The first proviso to Section 437(1) does not make release mandatory merely because the accused is a woman, and Section 437(6) is counted from the first date fixed for recording evidence after charge, not from pre-charge evidence in a complaint case. Compassionate grounds such as illness of a child did not outweigh custody where medical care was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>