https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73627 Successive petitions under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to reopen criminal proceedings after an earlier reasoned order declining interference has attained finality. The High Court held that a later inherent-jurisdiction petition, in substance seeking review or circumvention of the prior order, was not maintainable absent a new and independent legal basis. Delay and alleged abuse of process also did not justify quashing, because the earlier order had already found the delay sufficiently explained, the later delay was not attributable solely to the prosecution, and no fresh ground for interference was shown. The pending prosecution was therefore not liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73627 Successive petitions under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to reopen criminal proceedings after an earlier reasoned order declining interference has attained finality. The High Court held that a later inherent-jurisdiction petition, in substance seeking review or circumvention of the prior order, was not maintainable absent a new and independent legal basis. Delay and alleged abuse of process also did not justify quashing, because the earlier order had already found the delay sufficiently explained, the later delay was not attributable solely to the prosecution, and no fresh ground for interference was shown. The pending prosecution was therefore not liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 11 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73627