<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 148 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73615</link>
    <description>Preventive detention may be sustained despite existing judicial custody where the detaining authority is aware of custody and the likelihood of release on bail, and records satisfaction that detention remains necessary. Awareness of a pending bail application and a contemporaneous note supported the detention&#039;s validity. Preventive detention must address continuing prejudicial conduct affecting foreign exchange resources rather than punish past conduct or frustrate bail. Allegations of a collateral or punitive purpose were not established merely because bail was sought or not opposed; the alleged interconnected illicit foreign exchange activities supported a preventive purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 148 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73615</link>
      <description>Preventive detention may be sustained despite existing judicial custody where the detaining authority is aware of custody and the likelihood of release on bail, and records satisfaction that detention remains necessary. Awareness of a pending bail application and a contemporaneous note supported the detention&#039;s validity. Preventive detention must address continuing prejudicial conduct affecting foreign exchange resources rather than punish past conduct or frustrate bail. Allegations of a collateral or punitive purpose were not established merely because bail was sought or not opposed; the alleged interconnected illicit foreign exchange activities supported a preventive purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>