<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73609</link>
    <description>For Notification No. 89/79-C.E., the value of plant and machinery for small scale industry relief had to be computed on the machinery actually in existence at the relevant time. Permanently dismantled and removed machinery could not be included, because counting assets no longer in use would defeat the notification&#039;s object and create an anomalous valuation. The later notification expressly excluding permanently removed machinery supported the same approach under the earlier notification. The valuation therefore covered additions in existence from time to time, but excluded permanently dismantled and removed machinery, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:04:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73609</link>
      <description>For Notification No. 89/79-C.E., the value of plant and machinery for small scale industry relief had to be computed on the machinery actually in existence at the relevant time. Permanently dismantled and removed machinery could not be included, because counting assets no longer in use would defeat the notification&#039;s object and create an anomalous valuation. The later notification expressly excluding permanently removed machinery supported the same approach under the earlier notification. The valuation therefore covered additions in existence from time to time, but excluded permanently dismantled and removed machinery, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>