<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 195 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73589</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the Import Trade Control violations, finding no breach due to the timing of the import license issuance. However, the appellant was held responsible for misdeclaring the value of the imported goods, leading to a reduction in fines and penalties. The classification of goods and the reduction in fine and penalty amounts were addressed, resulting in a partial acceptance of the appeal with adjusted financial liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 195 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73589</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the Import Trade Control violations, finding no breach due to the timing of the import license issuance. However, the appellant was held responsible for misdeclaring the value of the imported goods, leading to a reduction in fines and penalties. The classification of goods and the reduction in fine and penalty amounts were addressed, resulting in a partial acceptance of the appeal with adjusted financial liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>