<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 182 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73538</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of the trucks and the penalties imposed on both appellants. It found the evidence against Santokh Singh, including statements of drivers and cleaners and his confessional statements, credible and sufficient. For Rajbir Singh, his presence at the loading site and subsequent abscondence were considered significant evidence of involvement. The appeals were rejected, affirming the order of the Additional Collector of Customs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 182 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73538</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of the trucks and the penalties imposed on both appellants. It found the evidence against Santokh Singh, including statements of drivers and cleaners and his confessional statements, credible and sufficient. For Rajbir Singh, his presence at the loading site and subsequent abscondence were considered significant evidence of involvement. The appeals were rejected, affirming the order of the Additional Collector of Customs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>