<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 269 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73530</link>
    <description>Interim stay of a rejected gold dealers licence renewal was granted because the majority found a strong prima facie case, noting prior renewal after earlier adjudication, no fresh contravention, and the risk of irreparable loss of livelihood if renewal were refused pending appeal. The majority treated the request as a limited interlocutory relief and held that the balance of convenience favoured protecting the applicant until the appeal was decided. A dissenting member considered that stay would effectively determine the appeal on merits and that interim relief was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 269 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73530</link>
      <description>Interim stay of a rejected gold dealers licence renewal was granted because the majority found a strong prima facie case, noting prior renewal after earlier adjudication, no fresh contravention, and the risk of irreparable loss of livelihood if renewal were refused pending appeal. The majority treated the request as a limited interlocutory relief and held that the balance of convenience favoured protecting the applicant until the appeal was decided. A dissenting member considered that stay would effectively determine the appeal on merits and that interim relief was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>