https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73517 A complaint disclosing facts that prima facie constitute an offence should not be quashed on the basis of investigation material that is not evidence, and a challenge based on lack of verification failed where the complaint specifically alleged that the Managing Director acted for the company. The quashing order was therefore set aside. However, because the alleged offence was very old and the proceedings had been repeatedly delayed, the Court held that it would not be in the interest of justice to revive the prosecution at such a late stage. The case was closed and exemplary costs were imposed. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73517 A complaint disclosing facts that prima facie constitute an offence should not be quashed on the basis of investigation material that is not evidence, and a challenge based on lack of verification failed where the complaint specifically alleged that the Managing Director acted for the company. The quashing order was therefore set aside. However, because the alleged offence was very old and the proceedings had been repeatedly delayed, the Court held that it would not be in the interest of justice to revive the prosecution at such a late stage. The case was closed and exemplary costs were imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73517