<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73502</link>
    <description>The appeal and cross objection were disposed of in favor of the appellants. The Assistant Collector was directed to re-determine assessable values in line with the judgment, providing consequential relief. The judgment clarified the distinction between wholesale and retail sales, emphasizing the importance of assessing transactions based on normal wholesale prices in certain scenarios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:40:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73502</link>
      <description>The appeal and cross objection were disposed of in favor of the appellants. The Assistant Collector was directed to re-determine assessable values in line with the judgment, providing consequential relief. The judgment clarified the distinction between wholesale and retail sales, emphasizing the importance of assessing transactions based on normal wholesale prices in certain scenarios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>