<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that impregnated glass fabrics were classifiable under Item No. 22B, CET both before and after 1-3-1979. The appeal was allowed in favor of the department, confirming the classification under Item No. 22B for the goods, rejecting the respondent&#039;s claim under Item No. 15A(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:26:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that impregnated glass fabrics were classifiable under Item No. 22B, CET both before and after 1-3-1979. The appeal was allowed in favor of the department, confirming the classification under Item No. 22B for the goods, rejecting the respondent&#039;s claim under Item No. 15A(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>